Read also: The HIV/AIDS Hoax
By Henry Bauer
The evidence that “HIV” did not and does not cause “AIDS” is overwhelming, and has been set out in dozens of books. The point is also demonstrated in The Case against HIV, which lists >900 publications, most of them mainstream sources.
It’s no secret that HIV/AIDS dogma nevertheless remains hegemonic among official institutions, national and international.
I’ve come to believe that this will not change until a large enough proportion of people stop accepting automatically whatever official sources claim about scientific matters.
The necessary skepticism about seemingly authoritative statements about science can only be learned by coming to understand how science is done, and in particular how it is done nowadays. That means coming to realize how drastically science has changed since about the middle of the 20th century, from largely believable to automatically and uncritically believable only at one’s peril.
I’ve set out the pertinent history of science on my other blog: How Science Has Changed — notably since World War II.
“It’s not even probable, let alone scientifically proven, that HIV causes AIDS. If there is evidence that HIV causes AIDS, there should be scientific documents which either singly or collectively demonstrate that fact, at least with a high probability. There are no such documents.”
Dr. Kary Mullis, Nobel Laureate for PCR (viral load) technology , HIV not Guilty, Oct.5, 1996
“At present there is no recognized standard for establishing the presence or absence of HIV-1 antibody in human blood.” (Abbott Laboratories, ELISA HIV Antibody Test Insert, section “Sensitivity and Specificity”)
“EIA testing cannot be used to diagnose AIDS… The risk of an asymptomatic person with a repeatedly reactive serum developing AIDS or an AIDS-related condition is not known.” (Abbott Laboratories, ELISA HIV Antibody Test Insert, section “Limitations of the Procedure”)
“Clinical studies continue to clarify and refine the interpretation and medical significance of the presence of antibodies to HIV-1.” (Abbott Laboratories, ELSA HIV Antibody Test Insert, section “Limitations of the Procedure”)
And then this from the Nobel Prize winner for the ‘discovery’ of the HIV-virus:
April, 2011 — HIV co-discoverer Luc Montagnier‘s extended House of Numbers interview:
“I believe we can be exposed to HIV many times without being chronically infected, our immune system will get rid of the virus within a few weeks, if you have a good immune system.”
A vaccine for HIV/AIDS
My immediate questions when people talk about a vaccine are:
How can you make a vaccine protecting people from a virus nobody has ever seen, or technically isolated?
What is in that vaccine? What are the components?
What are the long-term (5 – 10 years) side-effects of this vaccine?
Let me first give you the story of another medical myth/cover-up story: the story of the Spanish flu:
It started by American soldiers fighting during WWI:
I heard that seven men dropped dead in a doctor’s office after being vaccinated. This was in an army camp, so I wrote to the Government for verification. They sent me the report of U.S. Secretary of War, Henry L. Stimson. The report not only verified the report of the seven who dropped dead from the vaccines, but it stated that there had been 63 deaths and 28,585 cases of hepatitis as a direct result of the yellow fever vaccine during only 6 months of the war. That was only one of the 14 to 25 shots given the soldiers. We can imagine the damage that all these shots did to the men.
The First World War was of a short duration, so the vaccine makers were unable to use up all their vaccines. As they were (and still are) in business for profit, they decided to sell it to the rest of the population. So they drummed up the largest vaccination campaign in U.S. history. There were no epidemics to justify it so they used other tricks. Their propaganda claimed the soldiers were coming home from foreign countries with all kinds of diseases and that everyone must have all the shots on the market.
The people believed them because, first of all, they wanted to believe their doctors, and second, the returning soldiers certainly had been sick. They didn’t know it was from doctor-made vaccine diseases, as the army doctors don’t tell them things like that. Many of the returned soldiers were disabled for life by these drug-induced diseases. Many were insane from postvaccinal encephalitis, but the doctors called it shell shock, even though many had never left American soil.
The conglomerate disease brought on by the many poison vaccines baffled the doctors, as they never had a vaccination spree before which used so many different vaccines. The new disease they had created had symptoms of all the diseases they had injected into the man. There was the high fever, extreme weakness, abdominal rash and intestinal disturbance characteristic of typhoid. The diphtheria vaccine caused lung congestion, chills and fever, swollen, sore throat clogged with the false membrane, and the choking suffocation because of difficulty in breathing followed by gasping and death, after which the body turned black from stagnant blood that had been deprived of oxygen in the suffocation stages. In early days they called it Black Death. The other vaccines cause their own reactions — paralysis, brain damage, lockjaw, etc.
When doctors had tried to suppress the symptoms of the typhoid with a stronger vaccine, it caused a worse form of typhoid which they named paratyphoid. But when they concocted a stronger and more dangerous vaccine to suppress that one, they created an even worse disease which they didn’t have a name for. What should they call it? They didn’t want to tell the people what it really was — their own Frankenstein monster which they had created with their vaccines and suppressive medicines. They wanted to direct the blame away from themselves, so they called it Spanish Influenza. It was certainly not of Spanish origin, and the Spanish people resented the implication that the world-wide scourge of that day should be blamed on them. But the name stuck and American medical doctors and vaccine makers were not suspected of the crime of this widespread devastation — the 1918 Flu Epidemic. It is only in recent years that researchers have been digging up the facts and laying the blame where it belongs. (http://www.whale.to/vaccine/sf1.html)
Medical historians have finally come to the reluctant conclusion that the great flu “epidemic” of 1918 was solely attributable to the widespread use of vaccines. It was the first war in which vaccination was compulsory for all servicemen. The Boston Herald reported that forty-seven soldiers had been killed by vaccination in one month. As a result, the military hospitals were filled, not with wounded combat casualties, but with casualties of the vaccine. The epidemic was called “the Spanish Influenza,” a deliberately misleading appellation, which was intended to conceal its origin. This flu epidemic claimed twenty million victims; those who survived it were the ones who had refused the vaccine. http://elliotlakenews.wordpress.com/2007/11/17/vaccine-caused-spanish-flu-epidemic/
AIDS is not the only incomprehensible story about a virus. Other examples are the swine and the bird flu, you are urged by the medical world to vaccinate against these viruses also. The dangers of vaccinations are to be find all over the internet. It causes death, all kind of diseases and disabilities. But the Spanish flu certainly tops in the number of deaths due to mass vaccinations.
Four African Countries Approaching Control of Their HIV Epidemics as U.S. Continues Its Commitment to PEPFAR
Over one million people using deadly drugs for non-existing disease: ‘Over One Million Nigerians On Anti-Retroviral Therapy – Minister’
There is no ending to the multi-billion dollar scam called HIV: Injections may be ‘next revolution’ in HIV treatment, replacing daily pills – study